IT News

Social media influencers are attractive targets for identity thieves. With large followings and a literal influence on their followers, it’s no wonder they are targeted by scammers and spreaders of fake news.

A subset of influencers are the so-called “finfluencers”: influencers that provide their followers with financial advice. Such a person influences the financial investment decisions of their followers by doling out advice or recommendations. This comes in the form of get-rich-quick schemes, cryptocurrency related advice, stock investment, financial planning, or just about anything people can do to make money.

On the platforms that matter these days, like YouTube, TikTok and Instagram, the number of followers of some of the well-known finfluencers far exceeds the numbers of followers of some of the biggest broking houses. In May of 2023, India banned a YouTube finfluencer with over a million followers from the securities markets for a year for allegedly providing advisory services—daily stock investment/trading calls—without registering with the regulator.

With enough followers that heed their advice, these finfluencers also can have an effect on the financial markets. With enough demand, prices go up and if you know that’s going to happen, making money is indeed easy.

And as an exit scam in which you make one big whopper and then disappear, that’s a very profitable strategy. But most influencers are in it for the long run and don’t want to ruin the reputation they built. Unless their account falls into the wrong hands.

In October of 2023, the Federal Trade Commission warned people with a lot of social media followers they might be the target of scammers. These scammers would come up with fake job offers of offering to pay them for product promotion as “brand ambassadors.” But in reality the scammers are after personal and financial information.

Typically, the scammers say they’ll send you free products and pay you large amounts of money to promote those products in your social media posts. All you have to do is to accept the offer and give them your personal and banking information so they can pay you.

What the scammers are really after can vary from cleaning out the influencers’ bank accounts to taking over their social media accounts. “If you provide us with your login credentials, you don’t have to do the work, we’ll post the promotional content ourselves.”

The scammers will then leave the influencer behind with an account that has a bad reputation and lost a good part of its followers.

Some good news might come from the regulation side. The governments of ten nations have called on social media operators to improve their ability to detect and prevent fraud on their platforms. Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States did this because:

“Fraudsters operate at scale, exploiting telecommunications networks, cyberspace and a population that spends an increasing amount of time online.”

In a communiqué issued as a result of the Global Fraud Summit, which also included representatives from INTERPOL, the Financial Action Task Force, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, and the European Union, the partakers listed 29 action points that should help reduce online fraud.

It will be hard to accomplish this goal but as we have seen, similar actions led to a promising decline in robocalls. Australia also reported progress towards their vision of making Australia the world’s hardest target for scammers with, for example, a 38% decrease in losses due to investment scams.

What can influencers do to protect themselves

• Always assume that if it’s too good to be true, then it’s probably not true.
• Never give out your personal or financial information without doing proper research first.
• Contact the company directly to confirm the offer. Use a phone number or contact method you know to be legitimate.
• Check if the person contacting you is using an email address that’s affiliated with the company they claim to represent.
• Don’t let any person or app create posts on social media on your behalf.
• Don’t let scammers rush you into decisions. They will always claim it’s urgent or you need to act fast.

Check your digital footprint

If you want to find out how much of your data has been exposed online, you can try our free Digital Footprint scan. Fill in the email address you’re curious about (it’s best to submit the one you most frequently use) and we’ll send you a free report.

We don’t just report on threats – we help protect your social media

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Cyrus, powered by Malwarebytes.

A 42-year-old manager at an unnamed telecommunications company has admitted SIM swapping customers at his store.

SIM swapping, also known as SIM jacking, is the act of illegally taking over a target’s cell phone number and re-routing it to a phone under the attacker’s control.

Once an attacker has successfully hijacked their victim’s mobile number, they can use it to send and receive calls and messages (and the victim can’t). For that reason, SIM swapping can be used to get around two-factor authentication (2FA) codes sent by SMS message. Armed with an email and password—which are easily bought online— and the 2FA code, an attacker could take over the victim’s online accounts.

SIM swapping can be done in a number of ways, but perhaps the most common involves a social engineering attack on the victim’s carrier. However, if you have a telecoms manager on your payroll then there’s no need for social engineering—they can just do the SIM swap for you.

In May 2021, Jonathan Katz, aka “Luna” was employed as a manager at a telecoms store. Using managerial credentials, he swapped the SIM numbers associated with customers’ phone numbers into mobile devices controlled by another individual, enabling this person to control the customers’ phones and access the customers’ electronic accounts – including email, social media, and cryptocurrency accounts.

In exchange, Katz received $1,000 per SIM swap and a percentage of the revenue from the compromised phone number. He was paid in Bitcoin, which was traced back to Katz’s cryptocurrency account.

Katz pleaded guilty before Chief U.S. District Judge Renée Marie Bumb in Camden federal court on March 12, 2024, to a charge of conspiracy to gain unauthorized access to a protected computer.

Katz was charged for SIM swapping five numbers. He’s now facing a statutory maximum of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Sentencing is scheduled to take place on July 16, 2024.

What to do if you are a victim of SIM swapping

In this case, being careful online would not have helped the victims to prevent the SIM swap. However there are some things that are tell-tale signs of a SIM swapping attack and some things you can do to limit the consequential damage.

• If your mobile number suddenly is inactive or out of range, call your mobile operator immediately.
• Check your online accounts immediately if you receive a notification about unusual activity. Contact the account provider if you find you no longer have access yourself.
• If you can, register for email alerts as well as SMS for your banking transactions, so you continue to receive alerts via your email in case your SIM is deactivated.
• If you fall victim to a SIM hijacking attempt, change the passwords for services like your online banking and email immediately.
• If you notice irregular transactions, contact your bank to have your account blocked and avoid further fraud.
• Contact your cellular service provider so they can stop the attacker by cutting off their access to the mobile network.
• Consider setting up 2FA on dedicated authentication apps (such as Google Authenticator) or hardware, rather than using SMS.

Check your digital footprint

If you want to find out how much of your data has been exposed online, you can try our free Digital Footprint scan. Fill in the email address you’re curious about (it’s best to submit the one you most frequently use) and we’ll send you a free report.

We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.

Last week on Malwarebytes Labs:

• Ransomware’s appetite for US healthcare sees known attacks double in a year
• Webinar recap: 6 critical cyberthreats in 2024 and how to counter them
• TikTok faces ban in US unless it parts ways with Chinese owner ByteDance
• Malwarebytes Premium blocks 100% of malware during external AVLab test
• ThreatDown achieves perfect score in latest AVLab assessment
• How to update outdated software on Mac endpoints: Introducing ThreatDown VPM for Mac
• Microsoft Patch Tuesday March 2024 includes critical Hyper-V flaws
• New Facebook photo rule hoax spreads
• FakeBat delivered via several active malvertising campaigns
• Ransomware review: March 2024
• Data brokers admit they’re selling information on precise location, kids, and reproductive healthcare
• Going viral shouldn’t lead to bomb threats, with Leigh Honeywell: Lock and Code S05E06

Stay safe!

Our business solutions remove all remnants of ransomware and prevent you from getting reinfected. Want to learn more about how we can help protect your business? Get a free trial below.

Following the February 21 attack on Change Healthcare, scores of people in the US have been living with the brutal, real-world effects of ransomware.

Described by the American Hospital Association (AHA) President and CEO Rick Pollack as “the most significant and consequential incident of its kind against the US health care system in history,” the attack has stopped billions of dollars in payments flowing between doctors, hospitals, pharmacies and insurers. It has also created skyrocketing pharmacy bills, pushed some healthcare providers to the edge of insolvency, and led some small practices offering chemotherapy to warn that they are just weeks from turning patients away.

There are thousands of “big game” ransomware attacks like this every year—large scale cyberattacks that can bring entire organisations to a halt. They are always damaging and they always cause pain, but when they hit the healthcare system, the consequences—particularly the risk to life—are often more immediately obvious and shocking.

From time to time individual ransomware gangs will grandstand and say they don’t or won’t hit hospitals, but the truth is that healthcare has always been a major target.

Only three weeks ago, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a warning that ALPHV, the ransomware group behind the attack on Change Healthcare, was singling out targets in that sector, saying that “since mid-December 2023, of the nearly 70 leaked victims, the healthcare sector has been the most commonly victimized.”

ALPHV is just one gang among many targeting the sector. In the last 12 months, known ransomware attacks on US targets have increased an enormous 101% year-on-year, but attacks on healthcare have outpaced even that, increasing 137%.

70% of all known attacks on healthcare happen in the US.

This relentless assault has made healthcare the second most attacked sector in the US, where it accounts for 9% of known attacks. In the same period, healthcare accounted for just 3% of known attacks in the rest of the world.

The stark difference between the US and everywhere else may reflect the enormous size of the US healthcare market, or it could be the result of deliberate targeting.

Given its unmatched global footprint, it’s no suprise that LockBit was responsible for more attacks on US healthcare than any other ransomware group in the last year. LockBit is the most widely used ransomware in the world, and tops the list of most active groups across a wide variety of different countries and industry sectors. What is most striking about attacks on US healthcare though is the number of different gangs involved.

In the last year, 36 different ransomware groups are known to have attacked US healthcare targets, and, unusually, the combined contribution of gangs making just a few attacks each vastly outweighs the efforts of big gangs like LockBit and ALPHV.

It’s easy to see why so many ransomare gangs might be drawn to the sector: US healthcare companies are custodians of people’s most private data, guardians of their health, and part of a marketplace worth trillions of dollars. In other words, healthcare isn’t just another industry sector, either for the people who use it, or the people who prey on it. It is a special case, and there is an argument for saying that attacks on organisations like Change Healthcare should be treated like an attack on critical infrastructure.

The last attack on US critical infrastructure, against Colonial Pipeline in 2021, was met with an immediate and ferocious response. Within a month, the FBI had recovered the vast majority of the ransom. The gang behind it, DarkSide, lost control of its infrastructure to US law enforcement (and possibly US military) before going dark, and was quickly hounded out of existence by the FBI after it attempted to remerge and rebrand as BlackMatter.

Knowing that, perhaps it’s not a surprise that the attack on Change Healthcare was one of the ALPHV gang’s last acts before it disappeared in a sloppily exectuted exit scam.

How to avoid ransomware

• Block common forms of entry. Create a plan for patching vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems quickly; and disable or harden remote access like RDP and VPNs.
• Prevent intrusions. Stop threats early before they can even infiltrate or infect your endpoints. Use endpoint security software that can prevent exploits and malware used to deliver ransomware.
• Detect intrusions. Make it harder for intruders to operate inside your organization by segmenting networks and assigning access rights prudently. Use EDR or MDR to detect unusual activity before an attack occurs.
• Stop malicious encryption. Deploy Endpoint Detection and Response software like ThreatDown EDR that uses multiple different detection techniques to identify ransomware, and ransomware rollback to restore damaged system files.
• Create offsite, offline backups. Keep backups offsite and offline, beyond the reach of attackers. Test them regularly to make sure you can restore essential business functions swiftly.
• Don’t get attacked twice. Once you’ve isolated the outbreak and stopped the first attack, you must remove every trace of the attackers, their malware, their tools, and their methods of entry, to avoid being attacked again.

Our business solutions remove all remnants of ransomware and prevent you from getting reinfected. Want to learn more about how we can help protect your business? Get a free trial below.

Our webinar on the 2024 State of Malware report is now available on-demand. Featuring cybersecurity experts Mark Stockley and Jérôme Segura, this webinar unpacks 2024’s most critical cyberthreats, including big game ransomware, malvertising, and emerging challenges to mobile and Mac security.

Key highlights:

• Expert insights: Stockley and Segura explain how the cybercrime landscape has shifted significantly in the past year, outlining the six most critical cyberthreats to watch out for in 2024.
• Practical defense strategies: Learn about how layered defense systems, including EDR, MDR, and web protection, can protect your data, devices and your business from emerging cyber threats.
• Why it’s essential: The webinar equips IT and security teams with a new threat prevention playbook that they can leverage today to prepare for 2024 cyberthreats of all types–not just malware.

Don’t let evolving threats catch your organization off guard—watch the webinar and arm yourself with the latest insight.

The House of Representatives has passed a bill that would effectively ban TikTok from the US unless Chinese owner ByteDance gives up its share of the immensely popular app.

TikTok is an immensely popular social media platform that allows users to create, share, and discover, short video clips. It’s experienced explosive growth since it first appeared in 2017, and is now said to have well over 1.5 billion users, with an estimated 170 million of them in the US.

Since 2020, several governments and organizations have banned, or considered banning, TikTok from their staff’s devices, but a complete ban of an internet app would be a first in the US.

Other countries have done this before. In 2020, India was the first country to ban TikTok, along with around 200 other Chinese apps that were all blocked from operating within the country. The ban cost TikTok some 200 million users.

General Paul Nakasone, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) certainly fueled the feeling of necessity for such a ban. Speaking at a US Senate hearing in March 2023, the general said “one third of Americans get their news from TikTok”, adding “one sixth of American youth say they’re constantly on TikTok. That’s a loaded gun.”

And a former executive at TikTok’s parent company ByteDance claimed in court documents that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had access to TikTok data, despite the data being stored in the US. The allegations were made in a wrongful dismissal lawsuit which was filed in May in the San Francisco Superior Court.

Ever since then, TikTok has been battling to convince politicians that it operates independently of ByteDance, which has deep ties to the CCP. For example, TikTok has repeatedly claimed the Chinese government never demanded access to US data and that TikTok would not comply if it did.

All this, and the fear of foreign influence on the upcoming elections, led to the bipartisan legislation introduced in the House with the expectation to send it to the Senate later this week.

Essentially, the bill says that TikTok has to find a new owner that is not based in a foreign adversarial country within the next 180 days or face a ban until it does comply.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an international non-profit digital rights group based in the US, says it opposes this bill, mainly because it is afraid that TikTok will not be the last app to face this type of ban. It mentions Tencent’s WeChat app as an example of what could be the next target.

A year ago, supporters of digital rights across the country successfully stopped the federal RESTRICT Act aka the “TikTok ban.” The RESTRICT Act was introduced in the United States Senate on March 7, 2023 and requires federal actions to identify and mitigate foreign threats to information and communications technology products and services (e.g., social media applications). It also establishes civil and criminal penalties for violations under the bill.

The EFF argues that the bill will not stop the sharing of data but it will reduce online rights in a way that is unconstitutional. And it says the focus should be on the common practice of data collection in the first place, rather than single out one app.

The point made by the EFF stipulates that data brokers will continue to sell our information to whomever is willing to pay. And the apps providing brokers with data are certainly not limited to those that hail from a foreign adversarial country.

Chinese officials reportedly said the government would “firmly oppose” any forced sale of TikTok because it would “seriously undermine the confidence of investors from various countries, including China, to invest in the United States.”

Check your digital footprint

If you want to find out how much of your data has been exposed online, you can try our free Digital Footprint scan. Fill in the email address you’re curious about (it’s best to submit the one you most frequently use) and we’ll send you a free report.

We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.

Malwarebytes Premium earned a perfect score in the latest AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation “Advanced In-The-Wild Malware Test,” catching and stopping 100% of malware samples, outperforming multiple competitors in the field, and continuing a longstanding tradition of proven, perfect protection for users.

In the January evaluation, Malwarebytes Premium for Windows detected and blocked 380 out of 380 malware samples, with 69% (263 samples) detected “pre-launch” and 31% (117 samples) detected “post-launch.” The time to remediation was just 41 seconds—quicker than nearly every single competitor that also blocked all malware samples in the test.

For its performance and results, Malwarebytes obtained an “Excellent” award badge from AVLab.

Comprised of a small team of cybersecurity and information security experts, AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation regularly evaluations cybersecurity vendors on the performance of their products.

To ensure that the organization’s evaluations reflect current cyberthreats, each round of testing follows three steps:

1. Collecting and verifying in-the-wild malware: AVLab regularly collects malware samples from malicious and active URLs, testing the malware samples to understand their impact to networks and endpoints.
2. Simulating a real-world scenario in testing: To recreate how a real-life cyberattack would occur, AVLab uses the Firefox web browser to engage with the known, malicious URLs collected in the step prior. In the most recent test, AVLab emphasized the potential for these URLs to be sent over instant messaging platforms, including Discord and Telegram.
3. Incident recovery time assessment: With the various cybersecurity products installed, AVLab measures whether the evaluated product detects a malware sample, when it detects a sample, and how long it took to detect that sample. The last metric is referred to as “Remediation Time.”

In the January evaluation, AVLab tested 12 cybersecurity products (one of which included ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes). Just more than half of the products blocked 100% of the malware samples tested, and of those products, only one had a quicker Remeditation Time than Malwarebytes Premium for Windows.

Notably, the default cybersecurity program that many users rely on—Microsoft Defender—failed to detect and block two malware samples.

The work conducted by AVLav and other independent, third-party testers is vital to a transparent cybersecurity market. Users should not have to rely solely on the words of cybersecurity vendors, and vendors should be willing to submit their products to external reviews.

Malwarebytes is proud to once again achieve a 100% score with AVLab’s Advanced In-The-Wild Malware Test, a trusted resource that proves our commitment to user safety.

We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

ThreatDown has once again earned a perfect score in AVLabs’ January 2024 real-world malware detection tests, marking the eleventh consecutive quarter in achieving this feat. 

Let’s delve into the details of the test and how ThreatDown outperformed competitors in exhaustive testing. 

The AVLab Assessment 

AVLabs evaluation process is extensive and comprehensive, putting cybersecurity products through a rigorous series of real-world scenarios. The tests involve: 

1. Malware Collection: AVLab amasses a broad spectrum of malware samples from various sources, such as public feeds and custom honeypots. This ensures the test includes the most current and diverse set of threats. 
2. System Log Analysis: The collected malware samples undergo thorough scrutiny to confirm their malicious characteristics and their ability to successfully infect a Windows 10 system. 
3. Real-life Cyber Attack Simulations: All products are tested under the same conditions. AVLab recreates cyberattack scenarios akin to what’s seen in the real world, using techniques that actual attackers employ. 

Products that block all malware samples and achieve a maximum score of 100% protection are awarded an “Excellent” award badge. 

The Results 

ThreatDown consistently excels in the tests, and January 2024 was no different. ThreatDown Endpoint Protection earned “Excellent” badges for detecting and blocking 100% of malware. 

The standout performance is due to our superior detection approach that combines rules-based techniques with behavioral and AI-based methods to stop threats at every stage of an attack. Our proactive approach, which involves identifying threats even before they execute, played a crucial role in obtaining a perfect AVLab score.  

The Competition 

Other vendors struggled to match ThreatDowns results. Five vendors—Cegis Cyber, F-Secure Total, Microsoft Defender, Panda Dome Advanced, and Webroot Antivirus—all missed samples in the January 2024 test. 

The foundation for superior Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) 

ThreatDown Endpoint Protection (EP) is not merely a standalone product; it’s the bedrock of our ThreatDown Bundles, which combines the technologies and services that resource constrained IT teams need to take down threats, complexity, and cost. 

Leveraging the robust detection and prevention capabilities validated by AVLab’s tests, ThreatDown Bundles deliver a simple yet superior solution integrating award-winning endpoint protection technologies. Learn more about ThreatDown Bundles here.

For a deeper dive into our performance, view the full AVLab report here. 

ThreatDown is happy to announce that our Vulnerability Assessment and Patch Management (VPM) tool is now available for Mac endpoints. 

There are hundreds of third-party apps that Mac endpoint use on a daily basis—and with that large number of apps comes a dizzying amount of software updates to apply on a rolling basis. 

With VPM for Mac, Nebula and OneView users can now easily find missing updates and install them to take care of the large volume of software updates in third-party applications on Mac endpoints. Some key features include: 

• Single, lightweight agent: Updates install in minutes, using the same agent and cloud-based console that powers all ThreatDown endpoint security technologies. 
• Quick scans: Identifies software updates dates in modern and legacy applications in less than a minute. 
• Install software updates easily: Create a schedule to install third-party software updates regularly. 

Let’s dive into how to set up software updates for Mac endpoints with ThreatDown VPM.

Configuring VPM for Mac 

To configure VPM for Mac in Nebula/OneView: 

1. Go to Configure > Policies 

2. Create a new policy or select an existing policy. 

3. Click the Software management tab. 

4. Check mark Allow scanning for known vulnerabilities in installed software Mac endpoints.  

5. Click Save.  

In order to be able to apply software updates, users need to enable the policy setting Allow updating software inventory and applying Windows OS patches for endpoints for Mac.  

Viewing outdated software 

To view and update software: 

6. Go to Monitor > Software Inventory page. 

7. Filter Update available as Yes.

8. Click Actions.

9. Select Update Software.

10. Click Update.

You can also view outdated software by endpoint by: 

11. Click Manage > Endpoints  

12. Select specific endpoint(s) under the Software tab.  

13. Click Update Software.  

14. Click Update.

Updating outdated software 

To update outdated software, you can go directly to the Patch Management page as well: 

15. Manage > Patch Management 

16. Under Software Updates tab, select specific version(s) .

17. Click Actions. 

18. Select Update Software.

19. Click Update.

Try VPM for Mac today

3rd party software updates for Mac endpoints is available on both Nebula and OneView for our Patch Management users or users on an Advanced bundles and above.

Not a user but looking to learn more on how to protect your Mac endpoints? Reach out for a quote today.

The March 2024 Patch Tuesday update includes patches for 61 Microsoft vulnerabilities. Only two of the vulnerabilities are rated critical and both of these are found in Windows Hyper-V.

Hyper-V is a hardware virtualization product that allows you to run multiple operating systems as virtual machines (VMs) on Windows. A virtual machine is a computer program that emulates a physical computer. A physical “host” computer can run multiple separate “guest” VMs that are isolated from each other, and from the host. The physical resources of the host are allocated to the VMs by a software layer called the hypervisor, which acts an intermediary between the host and guests.

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database lists publicly disclosed computer security flaws. The Hyper-V CVEs patched in this round of updates are:

CVE-2024-21407 is a Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability with a CVSS score of 8.1 out of 10. Microsoft says exploitation is less likely since this vulnerability would require an authenticated attacker on a guest to send specially crafted file operation requests to hardware resources on the VM which could result in remote code execution on the host server.

This means the attacker would need a good deal of information about the specific environment, and to take additional actions prior to exploitation to prepare the target environment.

CVE-2024-21408 is a Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service (DOS) vulnerability with a CVSS score of 5.5 out of 10. This means an attacker could target a host machine from a guest and cause it to crash or stop functioning. However, Microsoft did not provide any additional details on how this DOS could occur.

The attention for Hyper-V is remarkable since only a week earlier, VMware released security updates to fix critical sandbox escape vulnerabilities in VMware ESXi, Workstation, Fusion, and Cloud Foundation. VMware ESXi and Hyper-V are both designed to handle large-scale virtualization deployments.

Another vulnerability worth mentioning is CVE-2024-21334, which has a CVSS score of 9.8 out of 10. It’s an Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) RCE vulnerability that affects System Center Operations Manager (SCOM). SCOM is a set of tools in Microsoft’s System Center for infrastructure monitoring and application performance management. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the OMI instance from the internet and sending specially crafted requests to trigger a use-after-free vulnerability.

OMI is an open source technology for environment management software products for Linux and Unix-based systems. The OMI project was set up to implement standards-based management so that every device in the world can be managed in a clear, consistent, and coherent way.

Use-after-free vulnerabilities are the result of the incorrect use of dynamic memory during a program’s operation. If, after freeing a memory location, a program does not clear the pointer to that memory, an attacker can exploit the error to manipulate the program. Referencing memory after it has been freed can cause a program to crash, use unexpected values, or execute code.

Microsoft states that if the Linux machines do not need network listening, OMI incoming ports can be disabled. In other cases, customers running affected versions of SCOM (System Center Operations Manager 2019 and 2022) should update to OMI version 1.8.1-0.

Other vendors

Other vendors have synchronized their periodic updates with Microsoft. Here are few major ones that you may find in your environment.

Adobe has released security updates to address vulnerabilities in several products:

• Adobe Experience Manager
• Adobe Premiere Pro
• Adobe ColdFusion
• Adobe Bridge
• Adobe Lightroom
• Adobe Animate

The Android Security Bulletin for February contains details of security vulnerabilities for patch level 2024-03-05 or later.

Apple has released a security update for iOS and iPadOS to patch two zero-day vulnerabilities

SAP has released its March 2024 Patch Day updates.

We don’t just report on vulnerabilities—we identify them, and prioritize action.

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep vulnerabilities in tow by using ThreatDown Vulnerability and Patch Management.